| |
|
|
| |
Case Study - DLR
On-Train Camera Image Protection, 10 May 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
In
the aftermath of the July 2005 terrorist attacks on London Underground,
railway operators and security authorities throughout the UK made
a detailed review of existing security systems, considering not
only means of anticipating and deterring future attacks but also
ways to identify those responsible in the event of such attacks
happening again. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Many
trains are already fitted with closed-circuit television cameras,
principally for passenger security reasons and it was recognised
that images from these cameras could provide valuable evidence
of events leading up to an attack provided the video record
was not destroyed in the attack and remained accessible for
examination. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Docklands
Light Railway (DLR), part of the Transport for London regional
authority, decided that measures should be taken to secure images
from their on-board cameras and Railcraft, as an established
provider of consultancy services to DLR, was commissioned to
carry out a high level study into how this might best be done. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
From
introductory meetings with DLR, four possible solutions were identified
for investigation:-
- Transmit
the on-train camera output in real time to a safe location off
the train.
- Protect
the existing data storage device.
- Relocate
the existing data storage device to a place that is safer and
easier to protect.
-
Fit an additional data storage device in a place that is safer
and easier to protect
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Using
our long experience in rail vehicle design and a good technical
understanding of what was required it was soon clear that because
of its position and relatively fragile design, neither protecting
nor relocating the existing storage device was practical. Pursuing
options 1 and 4 therefore, we identified manufacturers of leading
edge products in the data transmission and data storage fields for
whom we created and circulated a draft specification based on operator
priorities and UK Railway Group Standard GM/RT2472 "Data Recorders
on Trains - Design Requirements". |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The
most elegant but also technically the most difficult solution was
to transmit the data off the train, however detailed examination
revealed that even with the latest radio data transmission methods
the data handling rate and storage requirements for a large train
fleet were impractical. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The
most promising solution realised by the study was to fit an additional
data recorder of the new-generation electronic type with a solid
state memory e.g. Compact Flash card. This type of device, which
is inherently very small, robust and environmentally tolerant, is
being developed for demanding military or aerospace applications
such as flight data recorders in helicopters and fast jets where
temperature extremes and high accelerations make conventional recorders
unsuitable. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Data
recorders of this type typically have a working temperature range
of -40 to +80oC and shock resistance to ± 30g whilst Compact
Flash memory cards, particularly the encapsulated type, can withstand
much greater accelerations. Several reputable manufacturers of such
devices were identified, assessed and their proposals presented
in a comprehensive report to DLR with our analysis and recommendations. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|